Governing Magazine/August 1995 TECHNOLOGY COLUMN DON'T HANG BACK ON TECHNOLOGY By Jerry Mechling Jerry Mechling is director of the Program on Strategic Computing and Telecommunications in the Public Sector at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government. To reach him, call 617-495-3036 or send e-mail to jerrym@ksgrsch.harvard.edu. Dear Governor: With just a few exceptions--Michael O. Leavitt of Utah comes quickly to mind--you and the other governors have not been visible on information technology issues. Why? The primary rationale seems to be that you are needed for more important issues--those that require political leadership, not the numbing details of automation projects. Besides, you may not know much about technology, and thus may have little to contribute. I think you are wrong on both counts. Technology issues are of critical importance to the future of the economy, and the hard part is leadership, not technology per se. While hanging back was often sensible 10 years ago, it's increasingly dangerous now. Computing today is roughly 32 times (that's 3,200 percent) more productive than it was just 10 years ago, and gives every indication of growing another 32-fold more productive over the next decade as well. That big a change in managing information is beginning to generate big changes in organizing and managing work. The economy is becoming global and knowledge-based. To protect the welfare of your citizens and institutions, your state government will need to partner with other levels of government and with the private sector to prepare to make the transition to a knowledge-based economy and the related phenomenon of global electronic commerce. Uncertainty, anxiety and conflict will characterize this transition. It will require you and others to exercise wise and sustained leadership on technology-related issues. Your old stance of delegating technology to "the experts" will no longer suffice. In many ways, the economic trends are epitomized by the last decade's changes in the automobile bumper. Where once it was made of metals that were expensive to mine, manufacture and ship, today's bumper is fabricated of light, high-performance plastics that can be made anywhere in the world and shipped cheaply. As with the bumper, so with the rest of economic life. The keys to productivity and wealth are shifting from raw materials and energy to "codified knowledge"--knowledge made explicit, symbolic and readily processed and communicated over computer networks. Today's production processes accept inputs from anywhere in the world reachable by adequate computer-based communications. Your "local" telephone company directory-assistance operator may in fact be hundreds or thousands of miles away. Omaha is staking a claim to being the "1-800" capital of North America. Singapore is becoming your ally and your competitor. If you want productive (and therefore economically well-off) workers in a knowledge-based economy, you will need--as Omaha and Singapore are doing--to give them access to computer-networked organizations and to the markets where the world's commerce is shifting. A role for the governor? Most state economies have barely begun the institutional restructuring required for global electronic commerce. This is where you need to come in. Keep the costs down and the quality high for the infrastructure that business needs to compete, such as a well-trained work force and good transportation. Beyond that, you might begin with the following checklist: --Your planning process: Are you explicitly addressing the issue of preparing your state for a knowledge-based economy? You should be. --Your budget process: Are you finding the funds you need to invest in the information-infrastructure "seed corn" needed for the future? If you're having trouble, try looking to non-traditional financing sources such as user charges, bonds and partnerships with the private sector. --Staffing: Have you assembled trusted sources of leadership and the skills you will need in network-building and reengineering? These will be at a premium. --Partnerships: Have you mobilized not only your own administration but also supporters in other governments, industry groups, labor, the legislature, the press and the general public? You will need to decide how visible to make these issues. You could lose if the transition to a knowledge-based economy is not visible enough on the public agenda (and fails to mobilize needed support), but you could also lose if it is too visible (fanning controversy and partisanship). Success will involve judgment calls, not certainty, much as was true of the old western trail bosses whose persistence and general sense of direction were their greatest allies. For you, as for them, perhaps the best advice is: "Keep the herd headed roughly west." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright 1995, Congressional Quarterly, Inc. Reproduction in any form without the written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Governing, City & State and Governing.com are registered trademarks of Congressional Quarterly, Inc. http://governing.com